Saturday, December 8, 2012

December 2012 thru the looking glass

     I am having trouble adjusting to the fact that it is dark as night by 4:30 in the afternoon these days. Thinking about it I realize of course that these are the shortest days of the year and that the shortest days of the year are the days of Advent which some would argue are the among the most hopeful days of the Christian story told in the cycle of a year. These are the days of waiting and expectation for the wonder that is Christmas, the promise of something completely different for our world, the coming of the light. Perhaps it makes sense that the darkest time of the year is the time of hope. Certainly we can see the contrast between light and darkness. We can also appreciate the light. That is why I love the tradition of lighting candles in Advent. We are lighting candles in the darkness as we wait for the light to come. The lighting of candles in the dark is a precious metaphor for the Christian life. We can be a light in the darkness. Someone once said that they would rather light a candle against the night no matter how small and flickering than to curse the darkness. We are faced in these days with the choice of cursing the darkness, the clouds of anxiety and bad news that seem to have shrouded our world in permanent despair and fear or to light a candle against the despair and fear with acts of love and mercy, thoughts of kindness and hope. Joanna Adams, a pastor in Atlanta recently told this story: During the colonial period in American history, an eclipse of the sun caught members of a New England state legislature off guard. In the midst of general panic a motion was made to adjourn but one of the legislators stood up and said, “Mr. Speaker, if it is the end of the world and we adjourn, we shall appear to be fools. If it is the end of the world, I choose to be found doing my duty. I move you, sir, let candles be brought.”
And so, good sisters and brothers, bring on the Advent candles. It’s getting dark but love and hope can light our way. Larry
I know that I have life
only insofar as I have love.

I have no love
except it come from Thee.

Help me, please, to carry
this candle against the wind.
-Wendell Berry

Monday, October 1, 2012

thru the looking glass ~ Trinity Times Oct 2012

“By doing no harm, by avoiding evil of every kind,

especially that which is most generally practiced.”



So goes the first of the Three Simple Rules of John Wesley. It is a good place to start. I think we all know what it means to do no harm. (harm: hurt, injure, damage) Do no harm means we are not to hurt each other. We know this already. The key to this rule is the phrase which is most generally practiced. Unfortunately this is the harm we do often without even realizing it. It is the habit we fall into when we are not paying attention. We get tired. We have our own problems. We lose our patience. Our own pain lashes out and hurts anyone who happens to be there. This leads to more hurt and on and on it goes. In fact we need to be intentional about doing no harm. We need to take stock of our relationships and practice kindness rather than just hope it happens naturally. And we also need to go back when we hurt each other and seek to make it right, even to seek forgiveness.



If we follow this rule we will learn how to disagree without causing harm which is crucial for us as we go forward together. This step can provide a safe place to stand while the hard and faithful work of discernment is done. Only then are we free to discover the right path for us to go. This practice begins in the scripture where Paul writes: Love does not insist on its own way. It is not resentful or rude. In fact love is open to what will come but also and most importantly, to each other and all that we are going through as individuals and as a community. Someone once said: Be kind; everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle. Can we take the time to pay attention to each other, to look with the heart, to be compassionate? Can we care for each other and what they need with the same passion we care about ourselves and what we want?


This is our challenge as we live out the Three Simple Rules in community. It is not magic but when we treat each other with compassion and with mutual respect for the struggle we are each one undergoing as human beings in the world we will be transformed. We may even become the body of Christ in the world. Thanks be to God.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Moment of Truth (Sunday 9/16/2012) Sermon

Moment of Truth
Mark 8:31-37

I wanted to do something light and easy today as we are all in a mood to party and why not? It is a new beginning. We have accomplished some good work and there is hope for a bright new future but the Word for today it turns out is pretty serious. It is a turning point in the gospel story and perhaps in the story of humankind, what some might call a moment of truth. You may remember that Rabbit admired Owl for his ability to spell Tuesday which, if you remember when you were six years old was a difficult word to figure out. (Not as hard as Wednesday perhaps but tricky nonetheless) The only problem with this is that Owl couldn’t spell Tuesday at all. So, what Rabbit thought was true was not but he did come close to the truth himself when he said, There are days that spelling Tuesday doesn’t count. Why does this matter? Buechner wrote once that there are different kinds of truth. There is the truth that 2+2=4 or that Tuesday is spelled t-u-e-s-d-a-y but there is also the truth that can’t be quite so easily described, the truth that is more than the sum total of the facts.

I know it's a big subject. It is audacious if not presumptuous to speak of the truth. It may even be dangerous. Those who claim to have the truth have done their share of harm that's for sure. Our world is exploding as we gather this morning because of those whose own truth is being used as an excuse to kill and destroy. Personally I don’t think there is much that is true about it except the truth that hatred is alive and real. Even what is the truth about these events is lost in the politics and self-interests of who is telling what it is. How do we know what is true about something that is happening right before our eyes? (I told you it was a big subject.)

The truth I speak of this morning though is not truth as an absolute or as an ideology or as an abstract idea but the truth that is reality, the truth that reveals what is true about you and I and about life in general. Maybe we will even dare to venture into the truth about God at least insofar as we have experienced it through this word. And if we can't at least engage this topic here where can we? So anyway, here goes. There are two words that come to mind as I begin: the first is what the poet TS Eliot said that human kind cannot bear very much reality. And the other is what Jesus said, the truth will set you free. There is another word, too, of course, the one that a profoundly cynical Pilate spoke that still resounds loud and clear in the world we know: What is truth? suggesting perhaps that truth itself, any truth, is suspect. Could it be true that what is true is that there is nothing that is true? If so, who are we and what are we doing here and why does anything matter? In any case, it seems to me that truth, whatever it is or is not, must be handled very carefully so as not to cause harm either by being too sure of itself or so unsure that we have nothing left to get us through the night. You may recall that the answer Pilate got to his inquiry was the beaten and suffering Jesus just standing there in front of him without saying a word.

In the gospel reading today it is Peter who is confronted with the truth when he is asked the question about who do people think Jesus is. He gets what seems to be the right answer but (as usual) he doesn't really know what he is talking about. (I so identify with thus guy!) He declared Jesus the Messiah but then refused to accept what the Messiah would be. In the context of our story, he got the 'who' right but the 'what' wrong. The truth that was confronting him was that love must suffer, be rejected, even die. The cross is such a powerful symbol because it expresses this truth about life (about the way it is) - that love suffers. (You don’t have to be a theologian or a philosopher to know this. All who have loved and lost know this is true.) The cross is an important symbol because without it we tend to the delusion that life is easy and suffering is optional and that all you have to do to get along in life is live by the rules and mind your own business. Few who delve into these mysteries seriously have not wondered why suffering plays such a prominent role in the truth revealed in the story of Jesus. Mary Hinkle, an associate professor of New Testament at Luther Seminary in St. Paul Minnesota says this:

Maybe this is why Jesus becomes so angry with Peter. When Peter rejects Jesus' teaching that the Messiah must be crucified, Peter is beginning to fashion a lie about God. Surely, Peter is suggesting, there must be an easier way. I would like very much for Peter to be right, for I have never understood why God needed the bloody sacrifice of an innocent victim in order to forgive sin. Why couldn't Jesus have kept on healing people and telling parables and blessing children until, at an advanced age, he died in his sleep? Or aged gracefully as a teacher, spending summers at the lake, sporting a neatly trimmed salt-and-pepper beard, and greeting class after class of ever younger fresh-faced disciples every fall? "Consider the lilies . . ." he would say and pens would start scribbling across the page of notebooks. (Christian Century, September 6, 2003, p.18)

When Peter declared that this (referring to the suffering) must not happen to you (referring to Jesus) he had no idea that it would also happen to him. He found out the hard way that there is an easier way but it requires a lie such as Peter's own lie when he denied that he ever knew this guy they called Jesus. It was easy to lie at that moment when he feared for his life. Ironically the easy way, the lie, ends in pain also. The tears and the broken heart came anyway and from that came also the truth for Peter’s life which led Peter to find his own suffering for love. As Hinkle put it, Perhaps Jesus must suffer because he will not lie about what he knows of God.

If this is true then it seems to me that getting to know God is a lot more dangerous than considering the lilies. It is more like the Dillard experience who said one time that we ought to all be wearing crash helmets in church. Hard to imagine here isn't it? Doesn't feel very dangerous, some might even think it was boring. Maybe we like it that way. Maybe we don't want to know God either, not if it is going to cost us anything, not if it demands something from us, not if we have to suffer, especially if we are expected to choose suffering we could easily avoid. If this is what the truth has to offer then maybe we would just as soon stay with our delusions as long as possible. Someone once said that the truth may set you free but there's an even chance that first it will scare the daylights out of you.

It seems a terrible price to pay this idea that to love we must suffer, to be healed we must be broken, to live we must die. This is one of the things that so intrigues me about the Christian story. At the core of Christian belief is heavy stuff - tragedy, irony, paradox, redemption. Is this really the truth, the way things are? Why does this have to be so hard? Why does life demand so much from us? What, if anything, is the point of all this suffering?

In the truth that Jesus reveals we are asked, like Peter, to confront the reality that life is hard, there is no easy way; that much is asked of us, that love does suffer. But that is not the end of the story. There is something else. If we are willing to face the truth and accept reality and live faithfully by continuing to love through the suffering, we will in fact overcome adversity, endure every trouble, and the world and its people can be saved. Life is not found on the path that avoids reality and seeks an easier way. Keeping one’s own self safe and secure and undisturbed while others suffer will not suffice. For those who want to save their lives will lose them. Love gives itself away and it is there, where life is freely given for the sake of love, that life is abundantly present. The only love we get to keep is the love we give away.

Woody Allen has famously said: More than at any time in history, mankind faces the crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. I pray we have the wisdom to choose wisely.) Our faith story offers another choice. It calls for action, not despair but compassion. If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. In other words if we want to live life fully, to be with God, to choose life, we are asked to willingly take on the suffering of the world, to do something about it even if it means sacrifices of our comfort and ease. Taking up our cross does not mean lugging a piece of wood around on our back. It means doing something that may cost us something for the good of somebody else. It means addressing the suffering of the world with actions that heal what is broken, that make right what is wrong, that give instead of take.

Burton Cooper writes in Why, God? Jesus on the cross presents his failure to God. It is the failure of suffering love to coerce a loving response. But this defeat on the cross redefines failure for the Christian - and for the church. In his defeat, Christ denies the identification of God's power with coercion. Now it is a sign of failure to resort to coercive powers. In his defeat at the hands of the strong, Christ makes it a victory to identify with and care for the weak. Now it is a sign of failure to live with indifference to the suffering of the weak.

How far do we really want to go into the truth that is revealed in Jesus? How vulnerable will our trust in God allow us to be? How do we move from anger to compassion, from revenge to mercy, from fear to love? That is the place where Jesus takes us. It is as the old saying goes, the moment of truth.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

through the looking glass ... (Trinity Times Sept 2012)


through the looking glass

The work on the Church building is complete. It has been wondrous to watch the various pieces come together. We have talked about this renovation as an opportunity for a new beginning. Beyond the new look is the new us. How will we change? How can a new look be reflected in a new way of being?

I have been reading recently a little book entitled Breakfast with Buddha. It is fiction but as is true of any good fiction it is about life and how it is lived. This story has to do with a man who is relatively successful and just a regular guy who finds himself driving a holy man from the East across the United States. The book is really about how we see the world and what is at stake with our souls and the spiritual reality in general. At one point in the book the holy man says this: Everyday, he said, many times every day, you can go one way or the other way. You can go with anger or not go. Go with greed or not go. Go with hate or not go. And so on. Later he said these feel like small things, small choices, but every day, across one life, across many lives, if you choose the good way, again and again and again, in what you are thinking and what you are doing it changes you.

New beginnings mean change. We have changed the building. Can we change our hearts? If we need a word to guide us, the writer of the letter to the Ephesians put it plainly and practically, revealing, also, that the need for a change of heart has been with us in the church since the very beginning: Let no evil talk come out of your mouths, but only what is useful for building up, as there is need, so that your words may give grace to those who hear. Put away from you all bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ as forgiven you. (Ephesians 4: 29, 31)

When Bishop Reuben Job wrote his little book on the Three Simple Rules reflecting on John Wesley's General Rules for Methodist Societies he wrote how the practice of the first rule "Do no Harm" changed how he dealt with conflict and disagreement. I have also found, he wrote, that this first simple step, when practiced, can provide a safe place to stand while the hard and faithful work of discernment is done. When we agree that we will not harm those with whom we disagree, conversation, dialogue, and discovery of new insight become possible. If I am to do no harm, I can no longer gossip about the conflict. I can no longer speak disparagingly about those involved in the conflict. I can no longer manipulate the facts of the conflict. I can no longer diminish those who do not agree with me and must honor each as a child of God. What he does not say and I would add is that I can also trust that when someone disagrees with me they are not out to harm me and when I disagree with someone they can know that I mean them no harm. Together we are discerning a way we can go together. This is how it happens. In fact we need different perspectives (disagreement) to have a complete vision of the way forward but it won’t work until we learn how to disagree without causing harm. May this new season be a time of new life as together, celebrating even our differences, we practice loving one another and finding our way together.

Larry

Friday, August 31, 2012

Why They Left John 6:56-69 Sermon: Sunday 8/26/12

Why They Left   John 6:56-69 Sermon: Sunday 8/26/12    

How many Christians does it take to change a light bulb? Ten. 
One to change it, and nine to say how much better the old one was.

Usually when we imagine the Jesus story the people are clamoring to see him and to hear him and to follow him and you get the impression that the crowds grew each day until all the eye could see were people coming to Jesus. All that was needed was the good news, simple and bold, and they would come. If this is how it really was, the church-growth people would love it. If this fantasy could be parlayed into our times, Jesus would have blow-dried hair and wear a $1000 suit. There would be vast armies of Christians just to park the cars and there would be parking for everybody and Christianity would be an unqualified success, success that is measured by attendance whether it ever does anything good in the world or not. In this vision, all Christians would be rich and have above average children and would be always cheerful about everything. No problem except that in today's gospel reading the people are not coming they're leaving. Not everybody decided to follow Jesus. Not everybody was happy. Not everything was perfect. Not even for Jesus. Especially for Jesus. Some were turning away and leaving. Why?

 In this immediate context it appears that some were not comfortable with the body and blood thing. (You know: Eat my flesh and drink my blood. Still makes us cringe. Everybody probably knows the story of the little kid in church who heard the priest say the words, blood of Christ and blurted out in a loud voice, “Yuk!”) We don’t know if this was a hard teaching because they didn’t get the metaphor or because they did. I read somewhere that there was a rumor in the early days that Christians were eating babies that started with taking Jesus literally about eating flesh and drinking blood. I know, seems incredible but seriously can’t you see the headline in one of those newspapers people still read today saying VANISHING BABIES BELIEVED TO BE EATEN AT CHURCH. The rumor was of course founded in ignorance but also in malice as there were those who wanted to discredit the movement. Those who did understand what Jesus was saying may have been even more upset because what they heard was “come and die with me so that you will live.” It is said in a number of ways. One of the more straightforward declarations simply says: “those who want to be my followers let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me(John 8:34)  Paul referred to it as the foolishness we preach.(ICor.1) It seems foolish and it is hard to accept because it challenges our natural instinct toward self-preservation and self-centeredness. This was is and always will be a hard teaching, difficult to accept because it means that those who follow Jesus will give themselves rather than serve themselves. Life, according to Jesus, is not gained by taking whatever you can get but by giving all you have. 

So, how many light bulbs do we need?
As many as we want.

And, how many light bulbs does it take to change our hearts?
All you have.

 Of course there were also disagreements among those who would follow Jesus and how his words would be understood and what it actually meant people should do and disagreements about who would be in charge and decide these things. Some left because even Jesus wasn’t the Jesus they wanted. (They wanted a Jesus who would do what they wanted rather than do what he  wanted.) Disagreement is easy. We do it all the time. There has to be some disagreement of course until we get it right but some people just don't like disagreeing or feel that they never seem to have their way in the decisions and solutions so they leave too. Others are just disagreeable. (Sometimes they stay.) There are lots of reasons to leave. We know why they left. Maybe the more important question for us today is Why did anyone stay? Why are we still here? Why stay when it would be so easy to leave? Jesus' question of the day is abundantly clear: Do you also wish to go away? Peter's answer is pretty good. To whom would we go? The scriptures tell us that many left. It doesn't tell us where they went. Did they find something better than what God had offered in Jesus? Have we? Today we might have a few more options than Peter. There are any number of paths to follow but the question is still relevant. It is the question each of us must answer: To whom would we go?

John Ortberg, writing in the Christian Century says that Peter's answer  reminds him of  Winston Churchill's famous description of democracy as the worst form of government except for all the other forms of government that have ever been tried. Peter didn't answer the question directly like with a plain yes or no. He answered in the style of his master with yet another question. It is a good question, one with legs as we say. Where would we go? And why do we stay?

Jim Wallis writes that when the south African government canceled a political rally against apartheid, Desmond Tutu led a worship service in St. George's Cathedral. The walls were lined with soldiers and riot police carrying guns and bayonets, ready to close it down. Bishop Tutu began to speak of the evils of the apartheid system- how the rulers and authorities that propped it up were doomed to fail. He pointed a finger at the police who were there to record his words: "You may be powerful- very powerful- but you are not God. God cannot be mocked. You have already lost." Then, in a moment of unbearable tension, the bishop seemed to soften. Coming out from behind the pulpit he flashed that radiant Tutu smile and began to bounce up and down with glee. "Therefore, since you have already lost, we are inviting you to join the winning side."
The crowd roared, the police melted away, and the people began to dance.

So how many Christians does it take to change a light bulb, really?
It just takes one who wants to see the light. 

Perhaps we stay because we still want to know God.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

The Details Sermon: Sunday August 12, 2012

The Details
August 12, 2012 - Ephesians 4:25-5:2

The work on the Church building is nearly complete. It has been wondrous to watch the various pieces come together. First there is the grand vision and then there are the details. The vision isn’t complete without the details. We have talked about this renovation as an opportunity for a new beginning. This is a vision. We have a new appearance. This is good. It makes us think that things can change. The bright and shiny look lifts our hearts and our hopes. Still there is more to do. Beyond the new look is the new us. How will we change? Change is in the details. How can a new look be reflected in a new way of being? We have a new outward appearance. Now we can begin to think about a new inward presence. Our skin is looking good, so how is it with our soul?

I have been reading recently a little book entitled Breakfast with Buddha. It is fiction but as is true of any good fiction it is about life and how it is lived. This story has to do with a man who is relatively successful and just a regular guy who finds himself driving a holy man from the east across the United States. The book is really about how we see the world and what is at stake with our souls and the spiritual reality in general. At one point in the book the holy man says this: Everyday, he said, many times every day, you can go one way or the other way. You can go with anger or not go. Go with greed or not go. Go with hate or not go. And so on. Later he said these feel like small things, small choices, but every day, across one life, across many lives, if you choose the good way, again and again and again, in what you are thinking and what you are doing( it changes you).

We have changed the look of our outer space. Now, as always, is a good time to begin to work on our inner space. At the heart of the matter is the need to turn away from the way of slander and malice and fear and turn toward the way of kindness and mercy and love. The writer of the letter to the Ephesians put it as well as anyone and also illustrates that this has been an issue for the church since the very beginning: Let no evil talk come out of your mouths, but only what is useful for building up, as there is need, so that your words may give grace to those who hear. Put away from you all bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ as forgiven you.

When Bishop Reuben Job wrote his little book on the Three Simple Rules reflecting on John Wesley's General Rules for Methodist Societies he wrote how the practice of the first rule "Do no Harm" changed how he dealt with conflict and disagreement. I have also found, he wrote, that this first simple step, when practiced, can provide a safe place to stand while the hard and faithful work of discernment is done. When we agree that we will not harm those with whom we disagree, conversation, dialogue, and discovery of new insight become possible. He goes on to offer more detail: If I am to do no harm, I can no longer gossip about the conflict. I can no longer speak disparagingly about those involved in the conflict. I can no longer manipulate the facts of the conflict. I can no longer diminish those who do not agree with me and must honor each as a child of God. (What he does not say and I would add is that I can also trust that when someone disagrees with me they are not out to harm me and when I disagree with someone they can know that I mean them no harm. Together we are discerning a way we can go together.)

It is interesting to me that when John Wesley first came up with this General Rule he put it this way: By doing no harm, by avoiding evil of every kind, especially that which is most generally practiced. Especially that which is most generally practiced. I suspect that most of us tend to think of evil as something big and extraordinary, cataclysmic, even, but perhaps it is useful for us to entertain the idea that evil is also small and plain and all too ordinary. It is perhaps most damaging in its simple everyday forms that become habitual with us, an unkind word, an exaggeration of the facts for our own benefit or to the detriment of another, meanly assuming the worst of those who disagree with us and so on. Once again it is in the details. We can have a grand vision for ourselves and our life together (love one another) but it will be in the details (actually practicing kindness and listening without judging) that it becomes real.

You may not be surprised to know that such issues are nothing new with us. Thomas  Kempis writing in his classical little book entitled The Imitation of Christ 500 years ago said this: We cannot trust ourselves too much, because we often lack grace and understanding. The light within us is small, and we soon let even this burn out for lack of care. We condemn small things in others and pass over serious things in ourselves. We are quick enough to feel it when others hurt us - and we even harbor these feelings - but we do not notice how much we hurt others. A person who honestly examines his own behavior would never judge other people harshly.


A person who honestly examines his own behavior would never judge another too harshly. And I guess this is where it begins really, with confession, an honest examination of the ways we do cause harm. How can we do no harm if we have not realized what harm we have done and are doing? The good Bishop in speculating about why we do not practice this first rule asks the defining question: Are we ready to give up our most cherished possession - the certainty that we are right and others wrong? This raises what I believe we could call a conundrum: what if being right gets in the way of love? Can we trust God enough to give up the illusion of our own power to always be right in order to discover the truth and ultimately the way of love?

We religious types may be confused by this because we may think that love and what is right are the same thing so how can one be in the way of the other but the problem is that love lays itself down for others while being right insists on its own way. As Mark Twain famously said: He was a good man in the worst sense of the word. I think most of us have come across someone who was so right he was wrong. Perhaps some of us have even recognized that person in our self. It is a particularly vexing problem among the religious to need to be the one who is right. Where this rule, to do no harm, comes in is to raise the possibility that there may be something even more important than being right especially if what is thought to be right is actually causing harm. Is there anyone within the community of faith who has not seen this happening? How many have been hurt, how many lost to us?

Bishop Job says that if we were to take this first rule seriously it would mean an examination of the way we live and practice our faith. And if this examination were thorough, it would surely lead to a change in the way we practice our faith. He goes on to say: To do no harm is a proactive response to all that is evil - all that is damaging and destructive to humankind and God's good creation, and therefore, ultimately destructive to us. When I commit myself to this way, I must see each person as a child of God - a recipient of love unearned, unlimited, and undeserved - just like myself. And it is this vision of every other person as the object of God's love and deep awareness that I too live in the loving Presence that can hold me accountable to my commitment to do no harm. And then the Bishop comes out with it: Perhaps the greatest consequence of all is that we are formed and transformed to live more and more as Jesus lived. Wouldn't we like to be that Church, the one that embodies the living Christ in spirit and in practice?! All I know is that where Jesus abides there is life and joy.

Seeing through the eyes of Jesus is to see the sacred worth of every living thing and to see the connection, the interdependence between all of life. Enlightenment is when we understand that harming another is also harming our self. It is not enough to be right. We are called, as the writer to the Ephesian Church put it, to live in love. We are challenged by John Wesley to do no harm. Will we always succeed? Of course not. Even the Bishop asked the question: Is it possible to live in this complex and violent world without doing harm? A question which, by the way, he did not directly answer except to say that Jesus himself (remember him?) taught and practiced a way of living that did no harm and that our taking this simple step of wanting and practicing to do no harm will change your life in good and wonderful ways . . .One possibility is that we will learn forgiveness.

As we should know by now we don't do any of this in order to be successful but rather to be faithful. Whatever ones definition of success is, even in the Church, it is only in the fullness of faith itself that we can experience the abundance that is of God and prosper as those who are fully and deeply alive. This abundant life in God is as much about quality as it is about quantity. It truly is the peace that passes all understanding. The fullness of faith is not the certainty that we alone have the right belief but rather the practice of trusting God entirely for our lives freeing us to be merciful, to be kind, to give ourselves away for love and peace. It is certainly a real and good beginning toward being imitators of God as the writer of our text today implores us to be.

I call upon you, the good people of this United Methodist congregation on this day that we each examine our ways and change those things that are needed to be changed in order to practice doing no harm that we may continue to grow and increase in love and the measure of the fullness of Christ, and live in love. We don’t have to have a meeting to do this because we can each begin with ourselves to practice kindness, to listen to each other, to be less defensive and more forgiving. (You don’t have to even tell anybody what you are doing. It will be fun to see if anyone notices and to see how it makes you feel.) It is enough to seek a new way even if we are not instantly transformed to complete perfection in love for (in the words of Annie Dillard) we are found in all that we seek. And we become what we think and do. As the holy man in my book put it, Only to try is important. Even not to have violence in your thoughts is important.

When we practice kindness we become the kindness we practice. And kindness is akin to mercy and mercy is at the heart of God. Jesus’ hands were kind hands. To be like Jesus, and to have a new beginning as the community of the beloved, our hands will be kind hands. It’s all in the details.


Monday, June 4, 2012

through the looking glass


     Can it be that the summer is upon us? What a summer it promises to be! We are going to give our building a facelift. The time has come for the hard work of the Capital Campaign to be fulfilled. When we are finished our spirits will be lifted and our hopes raised as we enjoy a beautiful new place of worship and community and invite new friends and old to come and see what is happening here. I really believe that the improvements on our outward appearance will be reflected in our renewed spirit within to be a church that is alive and well and reaching out to the world around us, growing in number and in faith and in hope.

     This is also the summer of transition in our music program. Nancy and Charles will finally get to enjoy their retirement from the music program after helping us out this year as we waited for our new Director, Sebestyen Nyiro, to arrive. The word is that he will be here on August 16 and will begin a new era here at Holy Trinity. He is gifted and enthusiastic and will be a student at Boston University as well. In the meantime we have arranged for musicians to help us with worship through the summer. Charles and Nancy’s last Sunday and the last Sunday for the Choir until the fall was June 3. Susan Taormina will be at the organ for worship on June 10.

     Change is exciting. It can also be upsetting. We need more than ever to pull together and work with and for each other as we go forward. We will not all agree with everything that happens but we can find ways to overcome our differences with our shared love for this place and our mission in Christ to be the light of the world, to love one another. Teresa of Avila in the 16th century wrote: Christ has no body now on earth but ours, no hands but ours, no feet but ours, ours are the eyes through which Christ’s compassion looks on the world, ours are the feet with which he is to go about doing good, and ours are the hands with which he is to bless us now.

     With all that we have to do let us never lose sight of who we are and why we are here. May your summer be blessed with joy.

Larry

Sunday, April 29, 2012

May 2012



Beloved: Be glad. Life is a good thing. I have a memory of one of the first times I became aware of this basic fact. I was playing shortstop. I was probably 10 or 11 years old. My glove was worn in and I felt like I could catch anything that came to me. I willed every ball to be hit to me. The sun was shining. The birds were singing. The dandelions covered the outfield. The infield dirt was warm and soft. My jeans and sneakers and t-shirt were as much a part of me that summer as my own skin. I could have played forever. Sometimes I laughed right out loud for no apparent reason. I didn’t know it then but I know now that I was experiencing the joy of being alive, of being happy, of being myself. I hope you have a similar memory that reminds you of what joy feels like.

Life is good but it has a way of wearing us down. Things happen. There are reasons to be sad. People get hurt. There are reasons to worry about things. Things go wrong. There are things that have to be done. I can’t play shortstop forever. I have other things to do. At the same time the flowers still bloom. The sun still shines. Baseball still happens. The children are beautiful. Love never stops happening. People find each other. The joy may get lost in the weariness and sadness but it never goes away. This is the promise of Easter and why Easter is so important not just for what happened but what continues to happen. Yes, I know this is May but May is still part of the Easter season and appropriately so for May is beautiful and alive and a reminder that life is good. Easter goes on even beyond the liturgical calendar. We are now and always the Easter people. It takes more than one day to celebrate Easter even the rest of our lives.
Easter is the confirmation that life is good. We are skeptical. We have our doubts and for good reason. We become afraid. When you play shortstop and become afraid of the ball the joy is gone and terror takes over. Sure bad things happen in every life. The problem is when we begin to expect the bad things to happen and give up on the good, even quit playing. Easter won’t let us forget that goodness wins just like in the old movies.
This may be hard to believe. Heck, those who were there had a hard time believing it. Who could believe it? It is impossible. And yet, we are still wondering, still hoping that it is too good not to be true. And we are still wondering and still hoping because what happened is still happening.
What is preserved in Paul’s letters, the Gospels and Acts, the rest of the New Testament canon and the traditions of the church is, thankfully, not merely an historical record. Rather it is the record of the encounter between people of faith and the living Lord, the Risen Christ. Those who have experienced this encounter know that it is historical. It occurs in time and space over and over again. Moreover, this encounter is as real as real ever gets. (Peter Miano, The Word of God and the World of the Bible)
Joy. How could we forget? How could we let it go from us so easily? Easter is as real as real ever gets. Life is good. Don’t be afraid anymore. Be glad. Be generous. Be happy. Be grateful. Play ball!
Peace and love. 
Larry

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

through the looking glass….

Life only demands from you the strength you possess.
Only one feat is possible−not to have run away.”
-Dag Hammarskjold

The events of Holy Week surely reveal our weaknesses. Judas was impatient and disappointed and decided to force Jesus to be what he, Judas, thought he should be. Why didn’t Jesus do something?! Peter was afraid, unable to stay, unable not to run away. Others could not even stay awake. Many joined the mobs that do what mobs always do, what they are told, joining ignorance to ignorance until the innocent are unfailingly brutalized. Pilate was cynical and too clever, corrupted by power and indifference. The soldiers just obeyed orders and drove in the nails as if this was just doing their job.

If we ever wonder why horrible things happen in the history of humankind we need only look to the stories of Jesus’ last week on earth. What is significant in the story is what is different. What is different is the ending which is not an ending at all but rather a beginning (the possibility of a beginning) as we find from this story itself is often the case with endings. The ending of this story of brutal oppression and injustice, violence and mass stupidity is not the usual despair and endless grief and pain, human misery writ large over the centuries, but that there is hope for our hopelessness and there is strength for our weakness and what God can do can and does overcome what we do.

And that hope and that strength can be summarized in this way: Love is real and more powerful than our fear and sin, our violence against the gift of life itself. Love is of God and is forever and can save us from our weaknesses. Death is over come by life. Hatred is overwhelmed by love. Despair and fear are cast out by love. While it is evident that all the weaknesses of humankind revealed during Holy Week are still very present in our world today, there is always, always, the possibility of a new beginning if we don’t run away and hide. It is Easter that gives us the strength to not run away, to keep beginning, to keep acting in love, to keep doing what is right when everything seems so wrong. As such the resurrection continues and the world, though battered and torn, is not lost. Thanks be to God.

Larry

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Lent is the time for letting go of the heavy burdens we carry

through the looking glass

Lent is the time for letting go of the heavy burdens we carry –
all the things we don’t need, the broken wings we drag around unused
on our backs as if the disappointments 
and sorrows of the world left us hopeless,
letting go and making room for the light 
and becoming lighter on the earth
just barely touching the ground.
Lent is a journey of the heart through the desert
where there is hidden a well, the well itself,
that treasure in the field of which Jesus spoke,
the light in the darkness of the poet/prophets,
once discovered that it’s there somewhere,
once known but unseen, awakens the thirst
in the soul, a thirst that may have been forgotten
or is yet altogether unknown to us
is found in the words, and story,
the company of friends on the way,
the creating of our hands and heart,
the light for which the soul thirsts
without even knowing, the water of life,
the well in the desert that we know is there before we find it
as we learn how to make room in us for the light
letting go of what we hold that holds us down
and opening to the light to be lifted up,
to use our broken wings to fly.
So is the journey of lent.

Larry

Monday, January 30, 2012

Through the looking glass


As you probably know by now, I am a lover of good so-called children’s literature. In fact this column takes its name from the book of the same name that accompanies Alice in Wonderland and is a classic of very serious nonsense. There is a verse from Tweedledee (of Tweedledee and Tweedledum fame) that comes up every now and then in the continuing conversation of the world or more precisely, in our case, of the church, and even more precisely to be exact, our church.  It goes like this:
‘The time has come,’ the Walrus said,
‘To talk of many things:
Of shoes—and ships—and sealing wax—
Of cabbages—and kings—
And why the sea is boiling hot—
And whether pigs have wings.’

And so it is that we face the challenge of being the church in the world in these days. There are many things to consider, no doubt, and much has changed and is changing, yet some things, the things that matter, remain the same.  What remains the same is the God of love revealed to us in Jesus is calling us in from the world and gathering us into community (the church) in order to be sent forth enlightened and in peace to the world. What also remains the same is how we love each other and how we love the church. Make no mistake, without the love of God and the love with which we love each other and our church, we really do have nothing as St. Paul knew from the very beginning.

What has changed, and is changing, is the world and the place of the church in the world and the expectations of people about the church and the world. The challenge is to pay attention to what is happening and to understand what we are dealing with in order to do what God is calling us to do now. The challenge is discerning what matters and what needs to be done and how to do what needs to be done. We cannot just assume that business as usual will work and yet we know that the past informs the future and can never be completely lost either. As a community of the beloved we are, even now, in holy conversation about the life of our congregation and our witness to the world. We are challenged to be realistic and faithful. This will not always be easy but we are the church and we are standing on holy ground. We are not alone because the sum total of each one of us and our gifts united by the Spirit is more than we even know.

If you come into my study you may notice that I have a pig with wings hanging over my desk. It is a reminder to me that sometimes there is more to being faithful than just doing the same old thing and there is more to being faithful than I yet know or can even imagine. Because we are a people of faith what is possible is bigger than the usual expectations. And we are not stuck in ‘what is’ but are on our way to ‘what might be.’ You may recall in another part of this delightful and crazy little book that Alice declared she could not believe in impossible things and the Queen reminded her that she needed more practice. Our practice could do with some of that. Yes, the time as come again to talk of many things and not suppose that we can’t believe impossible things.

Bless your hearts, Larry

Holy Trinity United Methodist Church ~ Danvers